Greif proves evolution is a lie.

In recent days there was a vicious attack on a young child by a dog (not the first time) which is a very sad thing when happens. But what came out of this is a clear evidence that Evolution is nothing more than a complete lie. And that Genesis 1:26-27 is vindicated as being the truth: Man has inherent dignity; worth and value

And here are the reasons why this is the case:

Conclusion one: the very fact that such a horrendous act produces in other humans such  a brokenness inside due to the loss of a child provides us with a clear sign that we have been created in the image of God. And the loss of life cripple us to a degree that the loss of animal could never measure up to.  And here is the reason for that: the bond between a human parent and child transcends any other bond because it is a God given gift.   

Conclusion two: the fact that the taking of a life in such a manner requires swift action on the part of the law (the dog is to be put down). This is the recognition of the value of life that is inherent in mankind. Think about there is no need to for months of legality to determine whether a dog is innocent or guilty— it is decided on the spot.  This show us that despite one personal opinion that man does not matter more than other life-forms. 

Conclusion three: it is in these kinds barbaric attack (and others) that man's long held beliefs are challenged by the truth. On such belief is that of the evolutions survival of the fittest is seen as the fraud it is; because if were true then the idea of compassion and empathy would be simply foolish to express knowing that there is no value assigned to one species over another. In fact, that is why most evolutionists cannot consistently parade on about evil because it does not exist in their system of thought. But the truth is that it does. 

Popular posts from this blog

The insidious Gnosticism in Feminism

This title may be a little confusing because it is strange concept; yet I believe it is correct.  Now what Do I mean?  Let me explain:  Preliminary thought While what can be called "classical feminism" had an aim; no matter how misguided it may have been as what it was trying to fight for was a good thing just that it never needed to do such a thing; in the first place.  There had always been equality for the sexes due to the Christian faith-- just not identical rights-- for both men and women were equal before God in all thing pertaining to the faith. However, this equality did not rule  distinctive trait that defined each sex rather worked to enhance those wonderful points.  let me ask this:  did women gaining the vote ever do any good to society?  my answer is simple: NO.  the good it may have done was far overshadowed by the evils that were to seep through because of it being a slippery slope. for example: the vote was the catalyst to the dysfunction and utter break-down
Read more

Book Review: something must be known and felt.

Image
  Here we have a book which should be taken seriously by all serious minded Christians; who if they are are protestant in their thinking must always be willing to adapt their current understanding on doctrinal truths and practical issue (think of 'sempre-reformanda' which means always reforming). And if this were taken seriously then it should always welcome deeper understanding on certain issues. Let us always be of this frame of mind:  we should never say that the previous generations was in error; but that because of certain things being put in the spot light; therefore, many other areas which are equally important did not get as much coverage-- they were either taught upon in a foundational manner or simply assumed to be agreed upon. And this is the case at every high period of Church History. And it means some points will eventually have their moment at a later date. Take note of these words from Stuart Olyott . He writes: "In true Christianity God's revealed trut
Read more

The problem that Christians face.

  What is the primary thing that is consistently destroying the life of the ecclesia?   It is the institutional usurpation of the way things were meant to be carried out in the body of Christ. Let me make this point clear-- for much of the last 1800 years (but more so, from 325ad onwards) everything that we assume to be the correct manner is not only error; it is a danger to the health of the church.  In other words, the hierarchical system has no scriptural bearing.  The church as it was brought into existence through Christ and His Spirit by means of His apostles was an organic reality and not an institutional system. Take note of the following passages and tell me that what we have today in Evangelicalism (Today: institutional Christendom)  is what Christ put in place.  Paul teaches us that the function of the church is an internal all body dynamic-- and that all believers are to be participants and not spectators of some grand show: "And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the
Read more